Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ®

A Publication of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons ®

Trauma 147 articles

Articles

Does Postoperative Radiation Decrease Heterotopic Ossification After the Kocher-Langenbeck Approach for Acetabular Fracture?

Jason A. Davis MD, Brennan Roper BS, John W. Munz MD, Timothy S. Achor MD, Matthew Galpin RC, Andrew M. Choo MD, Joshua L. Gary MD

Controversy regarding heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis exists after Kocher-Langenbeck for treatment of acetabular fracture. Prophylaxis options include antiinflammatory oral medications, single-dose radiation therapy, and débridement of gluteus minimus muscle. Prior literature has suggested single-dose radiation therapy as the best prophylaxis to prevent HO formation. However, recent reports have emerged of radiation-induced sarcoma after radiotherapy for HO prophylaxis, which has led many surgeons to reconsider the risks and benefits of single-dose radiation therapy. We set out to determine if radiotherapy, in addition to standard débridement of gluteus minimus muscle, affected postoperative HO formation after a Kocher-Langenbeck approach for acetabular fracture.

Do Transsacral-transiliac Screws Across Uninjured Sacroiliac Joints Affect Pain and Functional Outcomes in Trauma Patients?

John Heydemann MD, Braden Hartline MD, Mary Elizabeth Gibson MD, Catherine G. Ambrose PhD, John W. Munz MD, Matthew Galpin RC, Timothy S. Achor MD, Joshua L. Gary MD

Patients with pelvic ring displacement and instability can benefit from surgical reduction and instrumentation to stabilize the pelvis and improve functional outcomes. Current treatments include iliosacral screw or transsacral-transiliac screw, which provides greater biomechanical stability. However, controversy exists regarding the effects of placement of a screw across an uninjured sacroiliac joint for pelvis stabilization after trauma.

Does Early versus Delayed Spanning External Fixation Impact Complication Rates for High-energy Tibial Plateau and Plafond Fractures?

Justin M. Haller MD, David Holt MD, David L. Rothberg MD, Erik N. Kubiak MD, Thomas F. Higgins MD

High-energy tibial plateau and tibial plafond fractures have a high complication rate and are frequently treated with a staged approach of spanning external fixation followed by definitive internal fixation after resolution of soft tissue swelling. A theoretical advantage to early spanning external fixation is that earlier fracture stabilization could prevent further soft tissue damage and potentially reduce the occurrence of subsequent infection. However, the relative urgency of applying the external fixator after injury is unknown, and whether delay in this intervention is correlated to subsequent treatment complications has not been examined.

Does Surgical Stabilization of Lateral Compression-type Pelvic Ring Fractures Decrease Patients’ Pain, Reduce Narcotic Use, and Improve Mobilization?

Jennifer Hagen MD, Renan Castillo PhD, Andrew Dubina MD, Greg Gaski MD, Theodore T. Manson MD, Robert V. O’Toole MD

Debate remains over the role of surgical treatment in minimally displaced lateral compression (Young-Burgess, LC, OTA 61-B1/B2) pelvic ring injuries. Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries are defined by an impaction fracture at the sacrum; type 2 (LC2) are defined by a fracture that extends through the posterior iliac wing at the level of the sacroiliac joint. Some believe that operative stabilization of these fractures limits pain and eases mobilization, but to our knowledge there are few controlled studies on the topic.

Psychosocial Factors Predict Pain and Physical Health After Lower Extremity Trauma

Kristin R. Archer PhD, DPT, Christine M. Abraham MA, MEd, William T. Obremskey MD, MPH

There has been increasing evidence to support the importance of psychosocial factors to poor outcomes after trauma. However, little is known about the contribution of pain catastrophizing and fear of movement to persistent pain and disability.

Erratum to: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Monique M. J. Walenkamp MD, MSCE, Lara M. Vos MD, Robert-Jan Muinck Keizer MD, Melvin P. Rosenwasser MD, J. Carel Goslings MD, PhD, Niels W. L. Schep MD, PhD, MSCE

Intraarticular Matrix Metalloproteinases and Aggrecan Degradation Are Elevated After Articular Fracture

Justin M. Haller MD, Craig A. Swearingen BS, Deveree Partridge MS, Molly McFadden MS, Kannan Thirunavukkarasu PhD, Thomas F. Higgins MD

Posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) is a variant of OA that can develop after articular injury. Although the mechanism(s) of posttraumatic OA are uncertain, the presence and impact of postinjury proteolytic enzymes on articular cartilage remain unknown. To our knowledge, there are no studies that evaluate the presence of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) or aggrecan degradation after articular fracture.

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Monique M. J. Walenkamp MD, MSCE, Robert-Jan Muinck Keizer MD, J. Carel Goslings MD, PhD, Lara M. Vos MD, Melvin P. Rosenwasser MD, Niels W. L. Schep MD, PhD, MSCE

The Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) is a commonly used instrument in upper extremity surgery and in research. However, to recognize a treatment effect expressed as a change in PRWE, it is important to be aware of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and the minimum detectable change (MDC). The MCID of an outcome tool like the PRWE is defined as the smallest change in a score that is likely to be appreciated by a patient as an important change, while the MDC is defined as the smallest amount of change that can be detected by an outcome measure. A numerical change in score that is less than the MCID, even when statistically significant, does not represent a true clinically relevant change. To our knowledge, the MCID and MDC of the PRWE have not been determined in patients with distal radius fractures.

Surgical Hip Dislocation Is a Reliable Approach for Treatment of Femoral Head Fractures

Alessandro Massè MD, Alessandro Aprato MD, Caterina Alluto MD, Marco Favuto MD, Reinhold Ganz MD

Femoral head fractures are rare injuries; incongruency and instability are indications for surgical intervention. Anterior, posterior, and transtrochanteric surgical approaches have been proposed, but the exposure is limited with classical approaches. Surgical hip dislocation allows for a 360° view of the head and may facilitate a reduction in selected head fractures, but to our knowledge, few studies have reported on the results with this technique. We therefore report on the (1) quality of fracture reduction; (2) modified Harris hip score at a minimum of 2 years (mean, 6 years, range, 26–122 months); and (3) frequency of complications, including avascular necrosis (AVN), arthritis development, and heterotopic ossification, in a case series of patients with femoral head fractures treated with this approach.

Are Volar Locking Plates Superior to Percutaneous K-wires for Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-analysis

Harman Chaudhry MD, Ydo V. Kleinlugtenbelt MD, Raman Mundi MD, Bill Ristevski MD, J. C. Goslings MD, PhD, Mohit Bhandari MD, PhD

Distal radius fractures are common, costly, and increasing in incidence. Percutaneous K-wire fixation and volar locking plates are two of the most commonly used surgical treatments for unstable dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. However, there is uncertainty regarding which of these treatments is superior.